<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windmill Drive to close to cyclists and pedestrians?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveclapham.com/windmill-drive-to-close-to-cyclists-and-pedestrians/1864/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/windmill-drive-to-close-to-cyclists-and-pedestrians/1864</link>
	<description>Information about Clapham and the surrounding areas with news, shop, restaurant and bar directory. Plus a forum for residents to chat about issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wardman</title>
		<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/windmill-drive-to-close-to-cyclists-and-pedestrians/1864/comment-page-1#comment-1625</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveclapham.com/?p=1864#comment-1625</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something funny here.

A scheme sold as &quot;safety improvement&quot; with no safety justification included in the consultation?

Closing half a road?

This is driven by the need to spend the pot of money rather than reach the best solution.

Cyril is right.

btw The Friends of Clapham Common say on their site that they are an &quot;association with 300 members&quot; rather than &quot;a committee&quot;.

Rgds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something funny here.</p>
<p>A scheme sold as &#8220;safety improvement&#8221; with no safety justification included in the consultation?</p>
<p>Closing half a road?</p>
<p>This is driven by the need to spend the pot of money rather than reach the best solution.</p>
<p>Cyril is right.</p>
<p>btw The Friends of Clapham Common say on their site that they are an &#8220;association with 300 members&#8221; rather than &#8220;a committee&#8221;.</p>
<p>Rgds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyril Richert</title>
		<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/windmill-drive-to-close-to-cyclists-and-pedestrians/1864/comment-page-1#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril Richert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveclapham.com/?p=1864#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>The correct answer would be that Wandsworth and Lambeth join efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The correct answer would be that Wandsworth and Lambeth join efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

