<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clapham Junction Station revamp scaled back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-station-revamp-scaled-back/2406/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-station-revamp-scaled-back/2406</link>
	<description>Information about Clapham and the surrounding areas with news, shop, restaurant and bar directory. Plus a forum for residents to chat about issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: love clapham</title>
		<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-station-revamp-scaled-back/2406/comment-page-1#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>love clapham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveclapham.com/?p=2406#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>Roy - I know officially it&#039;s Battersea, but everyone thinks it&#039;s Clapham, it&#039;s at the other end of Clapham Common and it&#039;s called Clapham Junction. So on here, Clapham Junction is counted as part of the Clapham part of London. 

Even if I were to decide it&#039;s not counted as Clapham, Clapham Junction is so near and so used by residents of Clapham that I would still report on it anyway.

Hope that clarifies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy &#8211; I know officially it&#8217;s Battersea, but everyone thinks it&#8217;s Clapham, it&#8217;s at the other end of Clapham Common and it&#8217;s called Clapham Junction. So on here, Clapham Junction is counted as part of the Clapham part of London. </p>
<p>Even if I were to decide it&#8217;s not counted as Clapham, Clapham Junction is so near and so used by residents of Clapham that I would still report on it anyway.</p>
<p>Hope that clarifies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-station-revamp-scaled-back/2406/comment-page-1#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveclapham.com/?p=2406#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit confused about your site. It&#039;s called love Clapham which is Clapham Common but you have storys about Clapham Junction which is in Battersea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit confused about your site. It&#8217;s called love Clapham which is Clapham Common but you have storys about Clapham Junction which is in Battersea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike B</title>
		<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-station-revamp-scaled-back/2406/comment-page-1#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveclapham.com/?p=2406#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>Got down to the sewer... sorry the tunnel... underneath the platforms the other day at 8.30am to be met by a solid wall of people. No one going anywhere... this station is so badly in need of a revamp just to give more options for getting in and out of the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got down to the sewer&#8230; sorry the tunnel&#8230; underneath the platforms the other day at 8.30am to be met by a solid wall of people. No one going anywhere&#8230; this station is so badly in need of a revamp just to give more options for getting in and out of the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

