<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clapham Junction hotel plans rejected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-hotel-plans-rejected/1561/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-hotel-plans-rejected/1561</link>
	<description>Information about Clapham and the surrounding areas with news, shop, restaurant and bar directory. Plus a forum for residents to chat about issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Wallington</title>
		<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-hotel-plans-rejected/1561/comment-page-1#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Wallington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveclapham.com/?p=1561#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>Thanks Cyril - I have corrected it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Cyril &#8211; I have corrected it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyril Richert</title>
		<link>http://www.loveclapham.com/clapham-junction-hotel-plans-rejected/1561/comment-page-1#comment-1549</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril Richert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveclapham.com/?p=1561#comment-1549</guid>
		<description>Just to be a little bit more precise, you shouldn&#039;t say &quot;The Wandsworth planning applications committee has rejected [...] the second time in recent months&quot;, because they (unfortunately) did not have the opportunity to refuse the two 42-storey towers as the application was withdrawn by the developers themselves 2 days before the committee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be a little bit more precise, you shouldn&#8217;t say &#8220;The Wandsworth planning applications committee has rejected [...] the second time in recent months&#8221;, because they (unfortunately) did not have the opportunity to refuse the two 42-storey towers as the application was withdrawn by the developers themselves 2 days before the committee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

